DiNitto (2005) gives a good number of standardized questions
that could be asked as one sets up the specifics of the evaluation. The specific methodology also needs to be decided upon.
Although experimental design is the best method for measuring cause and effect, there are ethical dimensions to be considered
(p.394). It would not be acceptable to randomly divide the older age cohorts into case groups, which would be allowed the
benefits of the OAA and control groups which would not be allowed to benefit. An alternative is to measure the outcomes of
those who voluntarily use the OAA benefits against those who choose not to use the benefits. However, gathering such data
would be daunting. The most reasonable method would be to measure outcomes from those who do obtain benefits from the OAA
based upon how those outcomes improved their quality of life. Qualitative research within the senior centers can, as an example,
ask seniors how they view their experiences at the center. This is the type of data that is constantly required by the federal
government of all AAAs in the country and provides a basis of measuring the effectiveness of the programs.
Dolgoff and Feldstein (2000) suggest specific areas of concern when analyzing and maintain a social welfare policy.
I. Structural Components:
A. What are the needs
and goals to be met?
Quality of life increases for those over age 60.
Rural vs. urban: The AoA recognizes
that the rural areas are not being served very
well at this time. They have set a goal that by 2007, 38% of rural elderly will be
served.
B. What is the form of benefit that the program produces?
The benefits are not money, but services and goods to save the older adult
money. They include the following areas:
Adult Protective Services through the Ombudsman
program
for nursing home residents.
Long-term ombudsman program seeks to protect residents rights.
Elder Locator to help locate services
for the older adult.
Employment services for
those over age 55.
Legal Assistance for simple wills, help on taxes, and the like.
Nutritional programs, both Meals on Wheels and congregate meals to
help older adults stay healthy and in their own homes.
Referral source information for all over 60 to help enable them to find
resources and the help that they may need.
Linking aging with public health through Title III. D. of the Older
Americans Act in preventative programs and practices.
Senior Citizen Centers
and other sites to provide activities and fellowship
among senior citizens.
Telephone reassurance programs to reach out to the isolated elderly.
Out reach services to identify older adults and their needs.
Alternative programs to provide services such as house cleaning,
bathing, health screenings, etc. to keep older adults in their own homes.
Similar programs are to be offered to
Native Americans.
(Elder Rights & Resources, n.d.)
& (Diwan, Berger, & Manns, 1997).
C. Who is eligible
for the program?
The
program is age tested and has three age levels. The employment services
are available at age 55. Most services and benefits are available by
age 60, and all benefits and services are available at age 65 and up.
Although
the OAA is only age tested, states have, in practice, been doing a
balancing act between universal and selective eligibility. Most services
are not advertised and purposely saved for those in greatest need. Asking
for donations from beneficiaries has become more emboldened.
D. How is the program
financed?
The foremost source of revenue is the U.S.
general tax revenues. Unfortunately authorizations have differed greatly
from appropriations actually received. States and local governments in some cases
add funds from their tax streams and local senior citizen centers regularly have
fund drives. Many sites have begun to charge a small “membership fee”
to belong to the center (usually $20 – 30 per year). Donations are accepted.
E. What is the
level of administration?
On the federal level the Administration on Aging, on the
regional level,
PSA’s, on the state level, the State Division of Aging,
on the local level
the Area Agency on Aging (AAA) and at the grass roots level,
senior
citizen centers.
II. Alternative program characteristics
As Justice (1995) considers the OAA program, she writes
that the program is not very helpful to the oldest old who are in the most need.
She also criticizes the program for not being very flexible towards meeting the
divergent needs of the elderly.
A.
Residual, institutional, developmental, or socio-economic development residual: The OAA can refer older adults to other programs to help in residual needs. It does have an effect on nursing homes by providing ombudsmen but does
not run institutional housing programs directly (Estes, Zulman, Goldberg, & Ogawa, 2004) and (Home and Community-Based
Services for Older Adults, n.d.). However, within the ombudsman program, Jogerst, Daly, Brinig, Dawson, Schumcuh, & Ingram
(2003), suggest that domestic elder abuse reports need to be standardized among the states, which is not yet the case.
The OAA is also charged with a
mandate to get the local community involved in the development of other programs
to help the senior citizen. Through teaching the use of computers and the Internet, the senior centers may impact the socio-economic
development of older Americans.
B.
Selective or universal:
The federal intent is that the OAA is a universal program for all Americans over age 60. However, the states are not
given enough funds for those lofty goals and are only able to treat the program as if it were selective as they target the
poorest segment of older adults. However, any one over 60 is accepted at the centers without a means test.
C. Benefits in money, service, or utilities
The OAA does not supply money to beneficiaries but, as an information and referral service, does offer to help older adults in filling out forms that may help them receive benefits from other government agencies (How to Find Help, n.d.). One referral services may be to
programs who do help the elderly with utility bills and fixing broken windows. However, the bulk of the OAA benefits are in
services which include Meals on Wheels and congregate meals, among other benefits (Wellman & Kamp, 2004).
D. Public, or private
Senior Citizen Centers, although public, are to try to encourage the private sector to help seniors as a part of their federal mandate. Due to cuts in actual funding, the thrust of this endeavor has been to increase the numbers of volunteers from businesses that will deliver Meals on Wheels during their normal lunch breaks (History, n.d.).
E. Central or local
The OAA programs are
provided on the local level with central oversight since funding comes mainly
from federal dollars. The Senior Citizen Centers must provide accounting of their
activities through the state aging service departments and on to the AoA. Local
oversight is also mandated by the states and counties.
F. Lay or professional
The AAAs employ professional workers both in aging services and for the senior citizen
centers. However, these relatively few people are aided by a host of volunteers who are usually seniors themselves.